Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66684
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.46 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
In-Reply-To: <5146E51B.7070105@anderiasch.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:55:04 -0400
Cc: Clint Priest <cpriest@zerocue.com>,
 Sherif Ramadan <theanomaly.is@gmail.com>,
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Durand?= <se8.and@gmail.com>,
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <B18A5376-D796-499F-830F-40D739C634F7@darkrainfall.org>
References: <CADoLna+RE_ojK1gKz-VaVyq7omAM9yaPezOi-sscVv2Ne3VsPg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL+t6cEnjoBf=vdcJd2Nr9GpYGk2caZh-qAxNEZigFZ2gDoP0A@mail.gmail.com> <5145C149.4010705@zerocue.com> <5146E51B.7070105@anderiasch.de>
To: Florian Anderiasch <ml@anderiasch.de>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting on PHP features
From: gwynne@darkrainfall.org (Gwynne Raskind)

On Mar 18, 2013, at 5:57 AM, Florian Anderiasch <ml@anderiasch.de> =
wrote:
> On 03/17/2013 02:12 PM, Clint Priest wrote:
>> Unfortunately my experience with that process has been that many =
people
>> will vote who had no part in the discussion.
>=20
> I don't see a point repeating points of discussion when being in
> agreement with people who already stated their opinion, or being
> persuaded by arguments given.
>=20
> I suppose the majority of voters will read the discussion, not
> necessarily actively participate. At least that would be sensible, =
right? :)
>=20
> Greetings,
> Florian

I practically never participate in discussions, but I always read them =
before voting. As you say, it's just common sense.

-- Gwynne Raskind