Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66662 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88157 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2013 06:53:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Mar 2013 06:53:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.192.174 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.174 mail-pd0-f174.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.174] ([209.85.192.174:64469] helo=mail-pd0-f174.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/F1-13245-40714415 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 01:53:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 10so377715pdi.19 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:53:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=rhnHU+42Iv57qn+OkImCW71CjA6DktPmZXxD7ur14bs=; b=n3qM5nkCbKgPNNmDG1TQV6CpZR0e5u/BVaf/PJIYzUrefqTY4Fv9nHd/OSocjp5EEr 3W52zFGKpfYTj61eVcruopv8t6mn7v1Y3LVIs13G2pLjd98ngaCWQxzGDEk4qn0WN0MV oF7ADGII7AREFZD2zL3O0s58AAomxGRi9NZwykiU9ByqzomPDynUAjIsQGMKEFeY/23k 3hjs10OY/QOU3I2lGNmyyncqiCzANwAZDSkNYgdXQrxVzikJlFDIG/hmi4GGct0K8KyO Bu6vFplIuIpGAd4PTmn8S9hUS5sP/PxjXVRr+v0D305ghgd8MxjFB+4F4FCN9P1je+9k kwYQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.138.135 with SMTP id qq7mr22600964pbb.42.1363416833676; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.70.28.65 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:53:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [98.210.180.187] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:53:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: s-JGLVE5v_-YfsiEKJe-WXXc4uc Message-ID: To: Kris Craig Cc: Peter Cowburn , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7r28w31oiZBirasht+gsntwwUK0FMtOPpUS25TIaKwC2YqQ0aLnDwSeWrOqBsUQHTcMX5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Allow trailing comma in function call argument lists From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) > I noticed that multiple people who expressed support for the RFC on this > thread have since cast "No" votes on the RFC. I'm confused. Does "No" > correspond to supporting the idea in this case, or did something happen > outside this thread that changed people's minds about it? > They probably just changed their minds, as happens. The initial swell of support was followed by a number of reasonable arguments against. That's what the RFC process is meant to do. :)