Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66647 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51902 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2013 15:05:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2013 15:05:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=steve@mrclay.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=steve@mrclay.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain mrclay.org from 50.22.11.19 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: steve@mrclay.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 50.22.11.19 bedford.accountservergroup.com Received: from [50.22.11.19] ([50.22.11.19:51737] helo=bedford.accountservergroup.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6F/00-51298-EB833415 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:05:35 -0500 Received: from n128-227-103-224.xlate.ufl.edu ([128.227.103.224]:56146 helo=Distance-Ed-Sclay.local) by bedford.accountservergroup.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UGWCJ-000DG3-T2 for internals@lists.php.net; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:05:31 -0500 Message-ID: <514338BA.10105@mrclay.org> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:05:30 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Internals References: <51432E01.7090502@mrclay.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bedford.accountservergroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.php.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mrclay.org Subject: Allow all callables to be called directly From: steve@mrclay.org (Steve Clay) My subject was misleading. I didn't mean to suggest call_user_func() be removed, just be made unnecessary by direct call syntax. This should make the inconsistency clearer: http://3v4l.org/L8Yvq On 3/15/13 10:21 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote: > You don't need to use it, if you don't like it. I do need to use in case my $callable is an object callback. Steve Clay -- http://www.mrclay.org/