Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66543 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61088 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2013 21:00:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2013 21:00:29 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.68 unknown Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:00:29 -0500 Received: from [217.114.211.68] ([217.114.211.68:4971] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DF/1B-31723-CEFF8315 for ; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:00:29 -0500 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <435a322ccb14090d3bcf6bf8a110396d@mail.gmail.com> <8944597477930141639@unknownmsgid> <5138CBBC.8030409@lerdorf.com> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (SunOS) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Posted-By: 217.114.211.68 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution From: dsp@php.net (David Soria Parra) On 2013-03-07, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On 03/07/2013 09:01 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > >> So my proposal is to slow down for a minute and not call this RFC >> accepted or not until we can come to some consensus as to if it >> classifies as a language change or not... Better to clarify for the >> health of the project than to plow through and risk causing further >> strife... > > And how do you propose we do that? Vote on it? Will that vote need 2/3 > as well? I think most of us accepted that language-level changes meant > syntax changes. Things that add new features to the language itself. I think the only thing requiring a 2/3 vote would be the decision on wheather to enable it by default or not. As long as it's in ext/ and not enabled a 50% should be sufficient.