Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66504
Return-Path: <ircmaxell@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 41326 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2013 21:36:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Mar 2013 21:36:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ircmaxell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ircmaxell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.172 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ircmaxell@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.172 mail-ve0-f172.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.128.172] ([209.85.128.172:43898] helo=mail-ve0-f172.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F3/50-39658-FD6B7315 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:36:32 -0500
Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id cz11so7297523veb.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:36:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=mKwhBALWHYB2Z3wUmdIzsLQQRk5ngbbboGGEJ28F6Wg=;
        b=EXOD7m1rNrROQeK75xJTRq69MsT4ioZulfKGfI5R7rZ2BN7+uUjnKC/cDDLO4QGdfp
         QJCwthtoLzP4Bw39oJpShTaKAf43pRz32zvAAPQggtIERvxfOrVYsSLhbKQmMbCY6MuN
         0qfRndkqhyRYwW0dcHUiRd24tCbD4BaVo1mZOQVcc4EM8r36Nr4FQD07XuQCoZKnFGwW
         D15vQE0GvU+qunjPWbtGIaRCpLzT4Fc4s9cDc769pQEmJQOArKyrqo3Ete2Joe9Vgb9E
         n+8ib3BbecQwvZFr4YbUp4PE9LeNIqWYZifBf1pTvNQomzBkMbwPWQgTSrpYXyC6LiLj
         5/1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.20.239 with SMTP id q15mr10468757vde.73.1362605788849;
 Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.56.137 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:36:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA9esyQ+fV3z4RTognX4zU+bDD1LweuMaP5heJgF+KY3T-azjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BLU0-SMTP206C4478D1BDF85B7E26DC3E2E40@phx.gbl>
	<5137B411.6010001@mrclay.org>
	<DUB405-EAS21A6530DE7FD9BAC940FF6E2E40@phx.gbl>
	<CAA9esyQ+fV3z4RTognX4zU+bDD1LweuMaP5heJgF+KY3T-azjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:36:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAyV7nFUEMJhi+uSZME=TdtA8mGedKS+Fzncpv4uQY7sGEa6Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florin Razvan Patan <florinpatan@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>, Steve Clay <steve@mrclay.org>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9b2e03cf8004d74862ad
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] unset(): return bool if the variable has existed
From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara)

--20cf307c9b2e03cf8004d74862ad
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Florin


Would it make more sense to return an array with keys the name of the
> variables that were unset and the result for each of them? This way
> one could better handle 'false' being returned.
>
> I'm not sure if it's possible or not, I didn't had the time to check
> out the patch.
>

If you need that much granularity, just call unset() individually for each
one...

Anthony

--20cf307c9b2e03cf8004d74862ad--