Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66434 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62805 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2013 07:07:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Mar 2013 07:07:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-la0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:62781] helo=mail-la0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CE/60-59723-1B6F2315 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 02:07:29 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fe20so4121735lab.29 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:07:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HW5ye2ILP/EJVdYiJLM0rjwRFvylaZyjDdCLeiWHYZo=; b=wvoHFF43152EgwI0JQMdIllqmJMdZLcBYpSaQmEeK3nssYev7u36K0O9maBmsyxmAZ C9hpGVJFH7KKRx4E76ouhgiIykEY16XZlDinNBcVkELoODwkUAsZ+6T8sK1pZvBYEKcl Ve6Y8YI5O8Dg6xxtEJxg2dXMcp1m5oi8L8/8twmpLBk6QG5gLj8EEIZiKBomvtOZJV23 GhbhgQneNiuiLGDJwqgEwPmGn+FHcjRERvhkRkmlICngTcR11eW4MLDQxw4ZzCF0d3g8 H/Zop9NoGZDK4t/+a/OiWajDsEUPh3hD2ph0ArK2g0qzvC+MPGh2D1eMufO3PVDYZ5j+ cWDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.102.177 with SMTP id fp17mr14157142lab.0.1362294444912; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:07:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.38.199 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:07:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8944597477930141639@unknownmsgid> References: <435a322ccb14090d3bcf6bf8a110396d@mail.gmail.com> <8944597477930141639@unknownmsgid> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:07:24 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Laruence , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Zeev, On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > ok, given the total lack of answers, mistakes and misleading wording > > in the RFC and lack of releases in PECL (which is a pre requise since > > quite some time to get in core), I'd to vote -1 for now. > > +1, > > there should be a option "release at PECL", which will give the O+ > more feedback and test > > > There is one, its the third option. Ok this is getting ridiculous. How "Don=92t integrate Optimizer+ to PHP" can be remotely related to the available of o+ via PECL? No matter the results, having o+ available in PECL for < 5.5 is a very good thing and many are expecting as well. Not doing it means that only 5.5 is supported and that defeats the whole purpose of having one opcode cache to rule them all. Why? Because we will still have to use most of our resources to support APC and wincache for 5.3 and 5.4. At some point I think I will simply do it myself and be done with this sterile discussion, it is OSS anyway and the license allows anyone to do it. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye