Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66419 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38000 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2013 09:28:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Mar 2013 09:28:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=Terry@ellisons.org.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=Terry@ellisons.org.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain ellisons.org.uk from 79.170.44.47 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: Terry@ellisons.org.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 79.170.44.47 mail47.extendcp.co.uk Received: from [79.170.44.47] ([79.170.44.47:38603] helo=mail47.extendcp.co.uk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6C/21-30973-436C1315 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:28:22 -0500 Received: from host81-132-45-215.range81-132.btcentralplus.com ([81.132.45.215] helo=[192.168.1.91]) by mail47.extendcp.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) id 1UBijp-0001oa-2Y; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:28:17 +0000 Message-ID: <5131C630.9010001@ellisons.org.uk> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:28:16 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zeev Suraski CC: Ferenc Kovacs , internals@lists.php.net, Dmitry Stogov References: <51314835.6060805@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090104020209090801070209" X-Authenticated-As: Terry@ellisons.org.uk Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] O+ support for PHP 5.x (Was current Status of O+ on Windows) From: Terry@ellisons.org.uk (Terry Ellison) --------------090104020209090801070209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/03/13 08:39, Zeev Suraski wrote: > The current vote that's going on right now deals with putting the extension > into PHP itself. If that happens (which seems awfully likely at this > point), why do we need it in PECL? My response to your Q is that there is probably going to be quite a lot of interest in an O+ package that is usable with PHP 5.3 and 5.4. Surely a PECL package will have a quicker uptake terms of getting it out into the wider PHP developers community and into production, especially if the main Linux distros add a precompiled php5-optimizer-plus package (or whatever their naming convention is). Would you see such O+ support for the existing supported versions best done through the PECL route or swept up into a maintenance dot release? Regards Terry --------------090104020209090801070209--