Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66348 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62672 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2013 19:17:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2013 19:17:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.139 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.139 smtp139.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.139] ([67.192.241.139:34714] helo=smtp139.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B2/47-25879-F2DAF215 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:17:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp30.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3D1A73498CD; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:17:00 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp30.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 45FE7348A5F; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:16:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <512FAD2B.1040903@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:16:59 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky CC: Anthony Ferrara , Zeev Suraski , Pierre Joye , Ferenc Kovacs , Rasmus Lerdorf , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <435a322ccb14090d3bcf6bf8a110396d@mail.gmail.com> <512E7870.7010208@lerdorf.com> <0b8c20490dae9ecb9f9cd4a77cf47796@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > If you are referring to APC as the stable cache, that unfortunately is > not entirely correct, it is still relatively easy to crash APC unless > some work-arounds are applied. I was speaking to a several people at > the conference just yesterday and they were indicating frequent > crashes with APC, the work-arounds appear to have solved their issues, > but those are not exactly obvious. Do we have those ways and work-arounds recorded somewhere? It would be a very good idea to have tests for O+ to ensure there are no problems in these areas (or if there are, to fix them :). My experience suggests opcode cache solutions often tend to have issues in the same areas, so I think it'd be very useful. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227