Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66298 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55745 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2013 20:06:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2013 20:06:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.155 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.155 smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.155] ([67.192.241.155:47817] helo=smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 34/99-33355-6376E215 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:06:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp32.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6291F50714; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:06:12 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp32.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id E286A504DB; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:06:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <512E6732.6010601@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:06:10 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Weinand CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <1361810738.2376.74.camel@guybrush> <512BA931.7010909@sugarcrm.com> <512BB284.4060900@sugarcrm.com> <1361826106.2376.78.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About restricting the recursive implicit calls From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > May someone merge this PR (#290) as there are no arguments against it? I just outlined arguments against it in my last emails. If your email is not working properly and you miss some emails please check the list archives. > Or do I have to wait a little bit? (How long?) In my personal opinion, indefinitely long, since I think it is not a good idea at all to have it in the core, and the same functionality already exists in xdebug. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227