Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66288 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29933 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2013 19:04:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2013 19:04:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.169 mail-vc0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.169] ([209.85.220.169:34925] helo=mail-vc0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/35-33355-8A85E215 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:04:08 -0500 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n10so636748vcn.0 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:04:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZWLNzNhs+h7H8QLZ2dl1dPjzD9k/KL8uv5atZ+knZ2c=; b=rVvzI1zmVV23VsEWILqo86tOmE4cXw8/YNs5d+QbbgjjpmhMrjg8NJqsIIXKJpKjlI st/c7rEjPFNCqOreOfI/xU4TF+8XvQcU/efTyXjSB9kMP2bOR2hlVom4+GWs44lMNXC5 Zks5tz6Bz4aHi/8SsJFezxxUpmux/Dnod9SrbWqHcGMFkvfRxevdnUTUuFUIvzBVyC8T QHQRsEAYecmn4D7+uGq5V16QoWsg0gTv3/coa0hNUJXxicxspcnSRNcrxITOq+IC2Ruk plNbWnWEG9RBzP4FADi9zoV7G46LSFnFbLhN8F7FBp/jIfuGk2aZ8FsJO4+2sgra60VQ lNdQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.69.74 with SMTP id c10mr1186817vdu.3.1361991844926; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.41.195 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:04:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:04:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] O+ - are we ready to go ahead and vote? From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Zeev, On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Are there any additional clarifications and/or unanswered questions people > are still waiting for, or can we move ahead to vote on the O+ inclusion RFC? I have mixed feelings. On one side I would say go ahead! But on the other side I've some worries. We discussed about 1st having in pecl, there is no release yet and this is something so easy and fast to do. I wonder why it was not done. There is also a couple of bugs (most of them seem to fixed but more testing are required). Once they are valid we can go for a wilder range of tests as these bugs simply prevent us to run many of the use cases. More on these cases later this week/early next week. But you moved to vote already, so it is barely pointless to argue or? I'd to get it in PECL as well, or even prior to any move to core. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye