Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66256
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 34639 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2013 18:59:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 26 Feb 2013 18:59:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.45 mail-la0-f45.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.45] ([209.85.215.45:35343] helo=mail-la0-f45.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id AF/B7-16132-2160D215 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:59:30 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id er20so4278958lab.18
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:59:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=QnHtXa4Uyh//E8ntF+bsbEM7I+HNPvAFj5h8TeWS7QI=;
        b=wTjQo5qz6ZOEFt1yCv1Alc7JZQAWDa7OyKO6Fl6/MYts9plYNroFcbnfJ/dQeQk0aq
         TKILCbQlFqIlOw3YCqY9cMQRKDBxs34RPTmDxyzy/sMEPH4c6qOvmHtwxEp4LOf69YWr
         kLmm2XMEajxfqv9IkbyRcyfHVYg8BBAlfUhlc2CwWyJNRzKWYIGqkZLpHryUOjWHKk19
         wg6kzB4RtANgct0EISoRNGpA4mKZ4yhF1PH4EKwYYSA4/W5a2phznMXDPMSpsy6U8J3y
         pYzswBjjcMMO2FU5nDByudZrvuwHm2MkDev4nc68P6Wysb2FE0UIKeVYh9vJKW3HPavZ
         fUVQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.9.10 with SMTP id v10mr1036771lba.47.1361905167388; Tue,
 26 Feb 2013 10:59:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.38.199 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:59:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9eiLvJ8-BnM-xm1N4Hfa+QN_jLtZ0HqwBkfEwawM_1mE0Y6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c8o=0u3deM6LA6TW9GjDeNrZA_16TAPBmHJQ7mN_P4v+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7RAGc6YULVzHGUTttGKw3bT6K1gdb3vnj6=EHF+LzjTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+9eiLvJ8-BnM-xm1N4Hfa+QN_jLtZ0HqwBkfEwawM_1mE0Y6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:59:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5VMUGtY=r4txbPvOTVyEM5Kf_a=VzkK=T7_eMUjFcyQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> The idea from the user perspective is very simple and clear.
> I really don't see what to discuss. All the questions are about
> implementation and they must be solvable.

The idea is all the edge cases and possible issues listed so it can be
easily reviewed and documented. As in: there is not much to discuss
but to test, document and maybe fix.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye