Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66223
Return-Path: <johannes@schlueters.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 14868 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2013 22:50:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2013 22:50:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johannes@schlueters.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johannes@schlueters.de; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain schlueters.de from 217.114.211.66 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johannes@schlueters.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.114.211.66 config.schlueters.de  
Received: from [217.114.211.66] ([217.114.211.66:59572] helo=config.schlueters.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id F3/D8-10787-8CAEB215 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:50:50 -0500
Received: from [192.168.2.20] (ppp-88-217-65-93.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.65.93])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by config.schlueters.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16A4265ED5;
	Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:50:45 +0100 (CET)
To: Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com>
Cc: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>, PHP List Developers Mailing
 <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP89CDA589122E02C918C8CEE2F30@phx.gbl>
References:
	 <CAF+90c8o=0u3deM6LA6TW9GjDeNrZA_16TAPBmHJQ7mN_P4v+A@mail.gmail.com>
	 <512BA9A6.6030006@oracle.com>
	 <CAESVnVqX0xiu8CZ=Mpyftm2_D_W_qoqUMLvmNF2qpYJZqh9B9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <BLU0-SMTP89CDA589122E02C918C8CEE2F30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:51:35 +0100
Message-ID: <1361832695.2376.91.camel@guybrush>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Allow (...)->foo() expressions not only for `new`
From: johannes@schlueters.de (Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter?=)

On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 23:20 +0100, Bob Weinand wrote:
> Don't consider it as a syntax change, only as a bugfix. It must have been a
> bug, that this degree of conformity was not yet reached. :-P
> 
> It's only stupid to vote about such microscopic changes as long as there are
> no real arguments against it in the discussion preceding the implementation.

This affects lots of tools: IDEs, Code Analyzers, ...  

It might also affect other syntax changes one might think of.

Not a small thing. Please mind the few processes we have.

johannes