Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66207 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81130 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2013 18:11:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2013 18:11:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 173.203.6.131 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.203.6.131 smtp131.ord.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [173.203.6.131] ([173.203.6.131:51622] helo=smtp131.ord.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2F/62-10787-739AB215 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:11:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 288C019816B; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:10:58 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp13.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id B1969198180; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:10:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <512BA931.7010909@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:10:57 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Weinand CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <1361810738.2376.74.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About restricting the recursive implicit calls From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Yes, but you can do an approximation. And in 99.999% of the cases 100 > will be enough. I can hardly imagine a case where you need to do over > 100 implicit function calls. They should fit in every normal stack size of > servers today. Depth-first search in a modest-size data structure would easily go over 100. But if you need it, xdebug already has this option. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227