Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66206 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78566 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2013 18:08:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2013 18:08:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 173.203.6.131 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.203.6.131 smtp131.ord.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [173.203.6.131] ([173.203.6.131:36953] helo=smtp131.ord.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 84/E1-10787-098AB215 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:08:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CD0FB1981A7; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:08:13 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp13.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 75D6519813A; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:08:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <512BA88C.4050704@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:08:12 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Weinand CC: PHP List Developers Mailing References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About restricting the recursive implicit calls From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > > p.s.: There is no reason why not to fix this in this way, I think, There actually is. First, any option modifying engine behavior creates a compatibility problem, since now the code that needs to work with it has to check and be tested for yet another variable. Second, why does it concentrate on magics? You can get stack overflow with any functions. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227