Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66194 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43435 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2013 15:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2013 15:36:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bobwei9@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bobwei9@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.111 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bobwei9@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.55.111.111 blu0-omc2-s36.blu0.hotmail.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [65.55.111.111] ([65.55.111.111:48573] helo=blu0-omc2-s36.blu0.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BE/CA-10787-E058B215 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:36:46 -0500 Received: from BLU0-SMTP175 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s36.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:36:44 -0800 X-EIP: [tyLHxdSu5UFaty3FyGlKOzocNp9XLVp2] X-Originating-Email: [bobwei9@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from bob-weinands-imac.fritz.box ([78.141.134.76]) by BLU0-SMTP175.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:36:42 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Disposition-Notification-To: bobwei9@hotmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:36:39 +0100 To: PHP List Developers Mailing MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2013 15:36:42.0231 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9082070:01CE136D] Subject: About restricting the recursive implicit calls From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand) Hi! https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/290 How should I name the ini parameter? max_magic_calls (magic ?=3D? everything which is not a direct function = call) max_implicit_calls max_implicit_function_calls Or what do you think is the most self documenting name? Bob p.s.: There is no reason why not to fix this in this way, I think, as = you can test at how may iterations the stack will overflow and set the = limit near to this maximum. Which is exactly what we have already today, = only without possible crashes.=