Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66163
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.181 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADNQb0XeEYSozjivjbKMHN_d=a-WBhv3Uqp6DT1F8xq-w_bgrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJhmKHkKbkXPKpCZVv1vD1cXrGWqeeB+UdNndN3ECfExW283-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADNQb0XnMvSJ1Hy_HLKvNSKzokL2ejXsNNcSSgPBKxjHPH7FdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5127CC82.1080400@lerdorf.com>
	<CADNQb0XeEYSozjivjbKMHN_d=a-WBhv3Uqp6DT1F8xq-w_bgrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:06:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJhmKHmKzCpSeeaGjo9XG+E7mzQf=m=YgqBd-ffmc+s=2Kq3bA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>, PHP Development <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234549af5ab504d655bba2
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Improved Linux process title support in the CLI SAPI
From: keyurgovande@gmail.com (Keyur Govande)

--e89a8f234549af5ab504d655bba2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson <
hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
> wrote:
> > On 02/22/2013 11:48 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Keyur Govande <keyurgovande@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> With the 2 weeks discussion period up, I'm moving this RFC to the
> Voting
> >>> stage. I'd like to get this into 5.5.
> >>>
> >>> Most of the reaction has been positive and is archived here:
> >>> http://marc.info/?t=136021582000003&r=1&w=2
> >>
> >> Just out of curiosity, I don't see it covered in the other thread; Is
> >> there a reason why it cannot support sapi/fpm?
> >
> > fpm has its own implementation already. I suppose we could swap out the
> > one in fpm and replace it with this one, but that seems like a separate
> > decision.
>
> Right, which makes me worry about the function name.. cli_*.
>
> -Hannes
>

If FPM wants to use these too, the implementation can be easily shared and
the wrappers around these can be created and called php_fpm_*. The reason
for CLI in the names was to indicate the limited availability of these
methods.

--e89a8f234549af5ab504d655bba2--