Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66162
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5127CC82.1080400@lerdorf.com>
References: <CAJhmKHkKbkXPKpCZVv1vD1cXrGWqeeB+UdNndN3ECfExW283-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADNQb0XnMvSJ1Hy_HLKvNSKzokL2ejXsNNcSSgPBKxjHPH7FdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5127CC82.1080400@lerdorf.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:59:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CADNQb0XeEYSozjivjbKMHN_d=a-WBhv3Uqp6DT1F8xq-w_bgrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Cc: Keyur Govande <keyurgovande@gmail.com>, PHP Development <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Improved Linux process title support in the CLI SAPI
From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson)

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 11:48 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Keyur Govande <keyurgovande@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> With the 2 weeks discussion period up, I'm moving this RFC to the Voting
>>> stage. I'd like to get this into 5.5.
>>>
>>> Most of the reaction has been positive and is archived here:
>>> http://marc.info/?t=136021582000003&r=1&w=2
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, I don't see it covered in the other thread; Is
>> there a reason why it cannot support sapi/fpm?
>
> fpm has its own implementation already. I suppose we could swap out the
> one in fpm and replace it with this one, but that seems like a separate
> decision.

Right, which makes me worry about the function name.. cli_*.

-Hannes