Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:66079 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97854 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2013 20:43:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 20:43:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=kris.craig@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=kris.craig@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: kris.craig@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.45 mail-wg0-f45.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.45] ([74.125.82.45:37633] helo=mail-wg0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3F/62-20257-55535215 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so7017868wgb.24 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:42:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4QToSFJ+55PbUaOHiN0odNs4+n8qi9SYywlWLmJEUww=; b=YoHStiVBMWJ1wNNxkX7deEmO+7E6Uq2wI+YvajO0BuIzarQFkiSqpCRvbCTfOaNKLN yMs94hOEUrCJ5Ip9naEyNHGWmZ2dXQoGb236q0OBFKlh6wGfjSwAyz7GuXz+YrwcM+fG 4OEFzHqzGHFQbLOdZDa8oA598TMModn+wCYy+HVvmsVY3CzFuMhWpudNCN1/dtFQ+mBU ForJrcv5dBi7iaWtujoXZjky85N7TlDh3HVKxpE9D8FnVqJb0+iH+54tTltqAfgDvT+l 9ysxYKzsnRHwGX1MMmDiqARgONJRdlX1pEiMfKBCbdyL76cKf2INmfaCG84NqiHwSOe4 sDDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.133 with SMTP id j5mr13502396wix.27.1361392978086; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:42:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.177.138 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:42:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5125339E.4050501@oracle.com> References: <5125339E.4050501@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:42:58 -0800 Message-ID: To: Christopher Jones Cc: Paul Reinheimer , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428cfcdbcac504d62e00fd Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP User Survey From: kris.craig@gmail.com (Kris Craig) --f46d04428cfcdbcac504d62e00fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Christopher Jones < christopher.jones@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 02/20/2013 12:00 PM, Paul Reinheimer wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> My apologies for the intrusion, I'll keep this brief. >> >> In many discussions over the past few months there has been talk about >> what >> the community at large needs. Pierre said just earlier today: >> >> "I would also say it us time for us to get back in sync with the >> communities needs. I am not talking about the last days RFCs but in >> general." >> > > Hi Paul, > > My thesis is the other way round. More people in the community need > to become PHP core developers. This is historically how PHP > development has occurred, since nobody has idle time to adopt projects > they are not 100% behind. > > Increasing user involvement is easier (and more often) said than done. > I'd prefer to see effort spent mentoring, rather than running surveys. > > I do have a lot of reservations about a survey. But if you do run > one, I'm sure I'll look at the results. > > Chris > > -- > christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd > Newly updated, free PHP & Oracle book: > http://www.oracle.com/**technetwork/topics/php/** > underground-php-oracle-manual-**098250.html > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I agree that we need more core devs (myself included), but I think it's worth remembering that most PHP developers are not programmers who would be comfortable working in ANSI C. The point of a survey would be to guage what PHP users want. Whether or not we choose to act on that would be up to the actual core devs, but at least we would have some helpful data on what the average PHP developer would like to see. We could probably mitigate your concern (and please correct me if I'm wrong on this assumption) by making it clear in the RFC that these survey results are completely non-binding and intended for informational purposes only. --f46d04428cfcdbcac504d62e00fd--