Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65914 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57665 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2013 23:40:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Feb 2013 23:40:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andre.romcke@ez.no; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andre.romcke@ez.no; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ez.no designates 216.32.181.183 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andre.romcke@ez.no X-Host-Fingerprint: 216.32.181.183 ch1ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com Received: from [216.32.181.183] ([216.32.181.183:54349] helo=ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CA/C3-34654-5DBB2215 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:40:07 -0500 Received: from mail153-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.230) by CH1EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.43.70.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:03 +0000 Received: from mail153-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail153-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587E82401AD; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.254.181;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:DBXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -4 X-BigFish: PS-4(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1d18h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275bhz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail153-ch1: domain of ez.no designates 157.56.254.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.254.181; envelope-from=andre.romcke@ez.no; helo=DBXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ; Received: from mail153-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail153-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1361230801700845_3084; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.235]) by mail153-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B01380046; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DBXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.254.181) by CH1EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (10.43.70.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:40:01 +0000 Received: from DBXPRD0711MB574.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.216]) by DBXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.178.34]) with mapi id 14.16.0263.000; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:39:59 +0000 To: Christopher Jones CC: Rasmus Lerdorf , Zeev Suraski , PHP Developers Mailing List Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available Thread-Index: Ac4J+YoXtHBofH1fT7K75u4wpnH5NAAMiuyAACbS7QAACHoOgAA5msmAACq1lIAAA/f2gABfv/cAAAaw44AAA13igA== Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:39:59 +0000 Message-ID: <508694C5-A7F5-4FD0-97B0-1E4D9D6E532B@ez.no> References: <511BFC81.8020400@oracle.com> <7de2703f77537a47b457c4479a19ac3a@mail.gmail.com> <511D39EF.5060409@oracle.com> <511EBC83.9010003@oracle.com> <0b00bdce214246c3fbca122e1e09a260@mail.gmail.com> <511FF5C3.3010905@lerdorf.com> <51227854.5030700@oracle.com> <5122A53B.2070308@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <5122A53B.2070308@oracle.com> Accept-Language: nb-NO, de-DE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.178.4] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ez.no Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Zend Optimizer+ Source Code now available From: andre.romcke@ez.no (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_R=F8mcke?=) On Feb 18, 2013, at 23:03 , Christopher Jones wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 02/18/2013 10:52 AM, Christopher Jones wrote: >=20 >> I agree that unless we get Gopal-like inspiration (inclued, scream) for = naming, "opcache" is best. >=20 > In the "so bad I can't resist sending it" category is today's > semi-humorous name suggestion: "Cajun". It sounds roughly like the > English pronunciation of "caching" >=20 > Sadly it's not as nicely self-documenting as "opcache". >=20 opcache is fine, its better that it's self describing then exiting. Cause then you don't have to google it to figure out what it is every time, like T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM :P So if you really have to make a name for it, keep it self describing, like:= OpsiCache Other then already being a used name, ops(i) is the word you would say in s= ome languages when you realize you have done a mistake :) =