Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65862
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain damz.org designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU68EdEowcigDJoEp-QTsRGXmP18yUn+-o=vXEEhJTNySw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEZPtU5XDK+ywOgerwDExOwcoZ1eSwyiwkkKeQSv6F_gCFi1Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<agsrh8h0305uuo4thj565aq47vmd98524g@4ax.com>
	<CAEZPtU4PUPEpOgoX9BgG6z2ioPGUPAJPPttGK6nPfNXcsh8kdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<baurh8l0to5issbin2l4u97gs2q8k2k900@4ax.com>
	<CAEZPtU68EdEowcigDJoEp-QTsRGXmP18yUn+-o=vXEEhJTNySw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:17:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CALWK-fjD0AzCx-s=aLv+219W+KbrnteEbeJOsk0eAJgbS6Rg8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2343b9a321a604d5bfd848
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: O+ 1st results
From: damz@damz.org (Damien Tournoud)

--e89a8f2343b9a321a604d5bfd848
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I assume that something is functionally wrong on Symfony/O+:

Symfony, IIS, cache, PHP5.5.0devvc11: 2195
Symfony, IIS, cache, PHP5.5.0devvc11: 1919
Symfony, IIS, cache, PHP5.5.0devvc11: 2127


There was a previous report that Twig did not work at all with
optimizations enabled.

Damien

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>> Pierre Joye in php.internals (Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:54:03 +0100):
>>>On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>>
>>>>>
http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20130213-5.4.11-5.5.0devvc11.html
>>>>
>>>> Is that the column 5.5.0devvc11 under APC -igbinary? I have a Drupal7
>>>> site running on my devserver (W2K8, Apache 2.4.3, PHP 5.3.21 TS as
>>>> mod_fcgid) and do not get the idea it is running at one third (21.9 /
>>>> 69.4) of the speed of the same site without any cache at all.
>>>
>>>No, but O+ is broken right now in ZTS, it makes no sense to do further
>>>testing before it works for more than 0.5 request ;)
>>>
>>>But running TS builds in FCGI reduces drastically the issues due to
>>>thread safety bugs, while it makes no sense to use them, fcgi and the
>>>likes should rely on NTS builds. ZTS will do all kind of locks where
>>>it is absolutely not required, that explains at least 15-20% of the
>>>perf drop, virtual paths cover the rest.
>>
>> I will try to compare the same site side-by-side with different configs.
>> The dev-server has 4 IPv4=adresses which gives a lot of config options.
>>
>>>>>Mediawiki is slower because it does not support yet O+ for usercache,
>>>>>along other things.
>>>>
>>>> Is the same the case with Symfony?
>>>
>>>no, MediaWiki caching modules only support APC or Wincache so far.
>>
>> Is the performance drop for Symfony in the Wincache test due to the fact
>> that wincache is optimized for IIS or are there other reasons?
>
> Did not analyze it yet.
>
> WinCache is not IIS optimized but FastCGI (read: process based). Also
> we did not enabled file IO cache, which could bring it up in line.
> But as neither APC or O+ have it, it cannot be compared.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>

--e89a8f2343b9a321a604d5bfd848--