Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65861
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <baurh8l0to5issbin2l4u97gs2q8k2k900@4ax.com>
References: <CAEZPtU5XDK+ywOgerwDExOwcoZ1eSwyiwkkKeQSv6F_gCFi1Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<agsrh8h0305uuo4thj565aq47vmd98524g@4ax.com>
	<CAEZPtU4PUPEpOgoX9BgG6z2ioPGUPAJPPttGK6nPfNXcsh8kdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<baurh8l0to5issbin2l4u97gs2q8k2k900@4ax.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:15:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU68EdEowcigDJoEp-QTsRGXmP18yUn+-o=vXEEhJTNySw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: O+ 1st results
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
> Pierre Joye in php.internals (Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:54:03 +0100):
>>On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>
>>>>http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/ostc/pftt/perf/results-20130213-5.4.11-5.5.0devvc11.html
>>>
>>> Is that the column 5.5.0devvc11 under APC -igbinary? I have a Drupal7
>>> site running on my devserver (W2K8, Apache 2.4.3, PHP 5.3.21 TS as
>>> mod_fcgid) and do not get the idea it is running at one third (21.9 /
>>> 69.4) of the speed of the same site without any cache at all.
>>
>>No, but O+ is broken right now in ZTS, it makes no sense to do further
>>testing before it works for more than 0.5 request ;)
>>
>>But running TS builds in FCGI reduces drastically the issues due to
>>thread safety bugs, while it makes no sense to use them, fcgi and the
>>likes should rely on NTS builds. ZTS will do all kind of locks where
>>it is absolutely not required, that explains at least 15-20% of the
>>perf drop, virtual paths cover the rest.
>
> I will try to compare the same site side-by-side with different configs.
> The dev-server has 4 IPv4=adresses which gives a lot of config options.
>
>>>>Mediawiki is slower because it does not support yet O+ for usercache,
>>>>along other things.
>>>
>>> Is the same the case with Symfony?
>>
>>no, MediaWiki caching modules only support APC or Wincache so far.
>
> Is the performance drop for Symfony in the Wincache test due to the fact
> that wincache is optimized for IIS or are there other reasons?

Did not analyze it yet.

WinCache is not IIS optimized but FastCGI (read: process based). Also
we did not enabled file IO cache, which could bring it up in line.
But as neither APC or O+ have it, it cannot be compared.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye