Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65768 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25612 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2013 07:05:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Feb 2013 07:05:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.123 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.123 smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.123] ([67.192.241.123:50478] helo=smtp123.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DA/60-22812-B4898115 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:05:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F26437813D; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:05:44 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp2.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id AB772780FB; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:05:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <51189847.5030506@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 23:05:43 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Remi Collet CC: PHP Internals References: <511666DE.8080809@fedoraproject.org> <51172819.4000806@sugarcrm.com> <51174790.8040805@fedoraproject.org> <511751C5.1020906@fedoraproject.org> <51175BDD.9040705@sugarcrm.com> <5117BA92.8080307@fedoraproject.org> <511890AC.7080506@fedoraproject.org> In-Reply-To: <511890AC.7080506@fedoraproject.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] double val to long val conversion issue From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! >> This was I was afraid. That bug was just the tip of the iceberg. I >> suggest we do change the the > operator to >= like you proposed, > > I will do it later today. >= may be fine, but I am concerned about fmod change for 5.4. If we do it, I'm afraid we may change some scenario, so I'd prefer to make it 5.5 only. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227