Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65714
Return-Path: <leight@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 27115 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2013 12:33:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Feb 2013 12:33:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.175 mail-wi0-f175.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.212.175] ([209.85.212.175:39885] helo=mail-wi0-f175.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A9/70-23848-71F93115 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 07:33:27 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so6287351wie.14
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 04:33:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=lfCXaS9fqS5uX2PWa9eslfny69bEWxclvYJwiV7poZM=;
        b=PvVSSBeeYUhnQ8wmskFzGXpkKuGOYe7Zh9UIOKcODvU3bhtfzrTeqXJfafA6IolnuI
         1uUduqI5cyk7kBov8F7IrVJYjBX+5Ti8CciQH3iAXFFQfhzX3FvsRsVYsZUAud3eVBQC
         Zku8mdkKPa6bBgPK+E82aaf8zxTZeEKd1e1zYVzp3gTTG0uJEpj3aF16cWZ+8GeQk86x
         f/sJGlIpRST+U1CgTd96kv4qqJRuYVHqLOyEuC+pyeYIZZE88stVT1LXD2CDb+Z36gNd
         LBa0mKrynJWAfFVDnbb42abqZX8h0xuFf0uNFxlj7fvIfrdCTr/mKxnYxgt3vqPg6DQe
         hxFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.97.197 with SMTP id ec5mr11490603wib.1.1360240404469;
 Thu, 07 Feb 2013 04:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.57.201 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 04:33:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2B76A3EF-66AC-4E73-B186-236E9C2AE891@gmail.com>
References: <CAJhmKH=6JzLLnQZ882dSLFO0OE8OC4aT0e0RGAF=T1qMTqtWWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPwsocHwV8cVLgsjcfZHOTZCv6k-KQhA0PUUthacKPgnUE8DEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<2B76A3EF-66AC-4E73-B186-236E9C2AE891@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:33:24 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPwsocECOzd-_Zk=xOJTJfd7VuYtbnosz=R2-aeS3OmvviyYeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com>
Cc: Keyur Govande <keyurgovande@gmail.com>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044306001e16b904d521a601
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Improved Linux process title support in the CLI SAPI
From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh)

--f46d044306001e16b904d521a601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 7 February 2013 12:22, Alexey Zakhlestin <indeyets@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 07.02.2013, at 13:54, Leigh <leight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There is a PECL extension that already does something similar. You may
> want
> > to take a look at that.
> >
> > http://pecl.php.net/package/proctitle
>
> Did you read RFC?
> Keyur mentions it and its limitations there
>

I only skimmed it very quickly if I'm honest.

Why does this need to be in core? This could just be done as a set of
improvements to the existing PECL extension instead. I'd guess that the
number of people who require (and would use) this functionality is very
very small indeed.

--f46d044306001e16b904d521a601--