Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65673 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44557 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2013 14:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2013 14:31:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.179 mail-ob0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.179] ([209.85.214.179:65154] helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 34/19-28596-1B711115 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:31:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id un3so193423obb.38 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:31:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-mailer :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=tOR/BzeijKOLCJrBExfjZNL9UCmIgmWWr/wCHrpphNU=; b=jt3tUgBzyAo1j9Zo2cGxNArWO5v0gVUZp5bqf9p93jOqQjxBy8VeGHBFKXe5M89lZR M71/2mpkJwpLnRIjawUtNxbKkHsydvfWa0EZRyhaj1AT0QiGd84kAA0LmdajwwRqBNiF +nyzEh5wpLlZCSEdnP9BPxr2sg3frn66v4+g8oMyaRIq76gxJQwsug+tv6nH3SZ36FXD pNUdeLJo6MhFPzF69cwXGXcvXxmmbCx/pHzPiedZ64r6/M/DrQtMCFj+uSIvTbiDawuZ g1N+cHvKJDxyJiolcTz0uIaplD6EbcZp5ggEanokTSPAPP8bLc1NoJu2/3Dkq6A3InjJ DpYg== X-Received: by 10.182.18.133 with SMTP id w5mr18702672obd.64.1360074670707; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:31:10 -0800 (PST) References: <5d21b42656d49b4a71d9f808541bd745@mail.gmail.com> <1359562177.37091.YahooMailNeo@web133001.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1359562237.22084.YahooMailNeo@web133001.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1360073623.83739.YahooMailNeo@web133006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1360073623.83739.YahooMailNeo@web133006.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIqL8waXVttbugrqkVxisGQEOzMkQHawY2bAc7yT9YBMfTp0wFIcYe/l4HX99A= Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:31:09 -0800 Message-ID: To: hakre Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnorIN47T6jx+Y0oiSZqqrk7Nvx1oB+PynQDuyIQxZErljpX8dEjQPmbzfQkDs+8JJnDRAYnlWpPJELziszccj7XsE96pt0JwHs/t4rP52BZSyqvr2ioaHz5mLOB18MjrkFsMA Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > > Based on an 18 month release cycle, and assuming we release 5.5.0 in > > mid 2013, 5.6.0 will come out late 2014. > > I wonder where you pick those quantifications from, according to > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess there is 12 month cycle/tact, and > according to the release date of PHP > 5.4 major releases (golden) are scheduled for the first of march each year > (alphas accordingly earlier). I'm taking it from both reality and the discussions we had surrounding the release process RFC (in short, the 'yearly' in there was subject to change without notice; It's not an 11th commandment). I see good reasons not to go with a yearly release cycle, considering there's next to nobody actually interested in consuming those releases, but that's another story. > >> > * Which benefits does Zend Inc. see in contributing the Opcode > >> cache? > > > > Simply put, this could benefit PHP greatly without negatively > > affecting our business in any way. > > And not simply put? Complexly put, this could benefit PHP greatly without negatively affecting our business in any way. I don't intend to become argumentative. You're obviously entitled to your opinion and I think that there's nothing I could say that would change it. Zeev