Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65617
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 87323 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2013 09:11:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2013 09:11:00 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.174 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.174 mail-lb0-f174.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.174] ([209.85.217.174:39887] helo=mail-lb0-f174.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E0/81-14611-32B7F015 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 04:11:00 -0500
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id l12so6465190lbo.19
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:10:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=YUeaQTuFcwhAxqbTUMq6uzhivmeUXFEKxdZ6XiKOAO8=;
        b=ZQ3dJ2W9a8DcQJzGK8szBE4z7G7qtDXQznEI6o4zZaeFzpR6Nt7bm4XHQhWJx6KmqB
         CqtCb21aQ2NNdLaUItVytG7JJ3qyhFEldOZMBG+pHtYHqvWjl7RG9IYfcElUj9XX996b
         vm/Gx6mifqoMbZwXCu27bWvoOwGMsjpbtHT0PGeL9kAxmLnN0SBb5/tm7FbQcw+xPXd6
         bqb78+1s8Hm/01sztM6N9meed+jkppxORux3fh8z9vo0H+Se6D5kA9oXddswx5Q6P373
         Ibqc3w7II7s0f/+0U/RHaGiWRYb+ra8ogMCcfcy4dL0uRmyHwp/cxli0InI2HgUk52wr
         yo/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.144.130 with SMTP id sm2mr18563165lab.49.1359969056021;
 Mon, 04 Feb 2013 01:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.111.131 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:10:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <510F79B4.1040405@lerdorf.com>
References: <CAPwsocHk=WW5ucvFXoS1Jg_7-s0-63TnitD-nAwAyHhdfEb1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH40dBQwWDeJ6dVPEuEu92Dno-oc5_dire_wuYzJx2dKmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU5_oge-uiLLFAWwOQqcg4DvaZF=syO1XRFTTNj4BpgwNA@mail.gmail.com>
	<510F79B4.1040405@lerdorf.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:10:55 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6PoP55shGpEbqsctc+CEPp-FvsyqB_WCegiJZDX+1h8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Cc: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>, Leigh <leight@gmail.com>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC 3.1.14 disappeared from PECL
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:

> Well, we don't have any sort of mechanism in place to mark a pecl
> release as bad. The best we have is the ability to delete a release and
> release a new one.

Right,but it was beta so... :)

However to mark a release as bad is not a small addition, as many just
do pecl update/install without checking the notes on the site. PEAR
will require changes too.

Cheers,
--
Pierre

@pierrejoye