Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65532 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 10648 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2013 10:34:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2013 10:34:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=chrisw@aquacool.ltd.uk; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=chrisw@aquacool.ltd.uk; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain aquacool.ltd.uk designates 77.107.181.84 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: chrisw@aquacool.ltd.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.107.181.84 stockport.aquacool.ltd.uk Received: from [77.107.181.84] ([77.107.181.84:55374] helo=stockport.aquacool.ltd.uk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/72-09318-5C84A015 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:34:46 -0500 Received: from DC01.aquacool.local ([fe80::9298:e041:a36d:d691]) by DC01.aquacool.local ([fe80::9298:e041:a36d:d691%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:34:42 +0000 To: "ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net" CC: "internals@lists.php.net" Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Proposal: php://memory/ (& ://temp/) Thread-Index: AQHN/5b4bRUOidzwGkuiKa+FajxFUZhjPBaQ Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:34:41 +0000 Message-ID: <075AE850888292488D400D9632DFE6E102400AA5@DC01.aquacool.local> References: <510A3B71.7060508@hoa-project.net> In-Reply-To: <510A3B71.7060508@hoa-project.net> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.63.150] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Proposal: php://memory/ (& ://temp/) From: chrisw@aquacool.ltd.uk (Chris Wright) > I propose the following syntax: > > php://memory/ > php://temp//maxmemory: I would very much like to see this as well. Would this also allow you to open multiple pointers to the same bucket? For example would this work?