Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65482 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52615 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2013 10:07:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2013 10:07:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.177 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.177 mail-ie0-f177.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.177] ([209.85.223.177:53395] helo=mail-ie0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9D/F7-09318-EE0F8015 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 05:07:43 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 16so1085343iea.8 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:07:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w0XV4abINKaxupgKhXOVi2NGCIYqyJGDrEhQR6HhdFk=; b=bKtwBI1bDvdIv8+tK1r2FqmKsIvpbDyjnQAxsr7vkcDMDp0DuU53mZKCn4Ou3WEO57 AUBzUq5bD8WMl4emFVT4Ra8PVQBbummsqyicTKYCUAGolLVgB2TmV4U+gjKX+ZWZn+vE LKAm4kjVPCRrFCVYM5Zui9EdCvZBoH0y5IoZg43s7Q06VCsrFOHYjqVPerDFhuta4S2U b5lvsw11ytZeIotuKIxpHDPVUg1edbSKe9kJb5p7z2cL3cFp3qX4+8fBaLM2z5W/R/LP UH8SiYDzny+sTB8hEcAflw9RK3oK40xkQpBmN+vJkyiyTkzE+K6WBZUKsTtp/+M2aepm c6oA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.185.196 with SMTP id fe4mr3103147igc.17.1359540460154; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:07:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.106.138 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:07:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5108ECF1.4080401@lsces.co.uk> References: <5108ECF1.4080401@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:07:39 +0100 Message-ID: To: Lester Caine Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93406652f6f0504d47eaed3 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Deprecate and remove calls from incompatible context From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --14dae93406652f6f0504d47eaed3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Gustavo Lopes wrote: > >> I've opened the vote for the "remove calls from incompatible context" RF= C: >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**incompat_ctx#vote >> > > FINALLY realised why this was an itch I had to scratch. > Why just pick on one aspect of E_STRICT ? Surely the end point should be > removing all of the 'advisory warnings' blocked by E_STRICT rather than > having a vote on each one. > > Flag as depricated ready to be removed in PHP6. So the discussion SHOULD > be on what else should be removed in PHP6 ? as I mentioned before in another thread back in the pre 5.3 days E_STRICT was indeed used in some cases for the same purposes as what E_DEPRECATED does now, but there are exceptions so these should be reviewed case by case basis for deprecation/removal instead of replacing every E_STRICT with E_DEPRECATED. --=20 Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu --14dae93406652f6f0504d47eaed3--