Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65411 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2238 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2013 15:45:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2013 15:45:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=keisial@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=keisial@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: keisial@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-wg0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:60503] helo=mail-wg0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1E/83-10721-C8EE7015 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:45:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fm10so385293wgb.33 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:45:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=40m6yHvMvIBH6XtbK9qYQwn5aE+PvzwtfqmG4/8F8L0=; b=fwXzQeiiE1PYF9RX5mgeH3hswqeUCcf/Y1vlobSMxxjSAGr5XUcpcJVBHzUpW6uHPs M32Ey84cp3vTEGPAxXPlafFFHmxuxgISOKiQNEAyRNpZwcmuQfYToP4GRxXtZlylsJFM keGz3X8BMltW/tTeqBvDYqP4ZTEsdYcDT4eYErO0jex1jmW6ZfaS8hWkPbVZlaHU3odi X0zdhhYeLweAfiF6bx9m6evchyCLafrvpkbKcPKU6A5GT4WEY73mPqJZLenfu9923NQh jH5Q1rpkR/4dAtrCOZFik0X99KBmROIzwTC4j3FlQCCYHDS7o7spoODNR0zC0/J60lK2 2aZw== X-Received: by 10.180.103.136 with SMTP id fw8mr3201649wib.27.1359474314098; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:45:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.26] (143.red-80-28-71.adsl.dynamic.ccgg.telefonica.net. [80.28.71.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eo10sm3983555wib.9.2013.01.29.07.45.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:45:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5107EE1A.2050100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:43:22 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Zeev Suraski , PHP internals , Rasmus Lerdorf References: <1359459921.3916.105.camel@guybrush> <5107CFBD.80606@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it? From: keisial@gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1ngel_Gonz=E1lez?=) On 29/01/13 15:21, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> On Windows with impersonation you're actually in a better situation than >> you are in Linux. You could hold a small pool of processes and handle as >> many different users as you'd like. > Works fine with ZTS too btw, IIS takes care about managing the > respective application pools. > > But yes, impersonation is a huge on Windows/IIS, get ride of > openbasedir and all that in one go (and again, not NTS specific). Wouldn't that be equivalent security-wise to running the server on linux as root for calling setuid() to each user?