Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65400 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84131 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2013 14:35:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2013 14:35:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:52591] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C4/DF-10721-21ED7015 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:34:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B4D10C599; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:34:54 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:34:54 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Zeev Suraski cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-13603194-1359470095=:6128" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it? From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-13603194-1359470095=:6128 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Which brings me to the subject of this mail =E2=80=93 why are you using Z= TS=20 > PHP instead of single threaded PHP? The reasons not to use it are few=20 > but fairly major =E2=80=93 it=E2=80=99s significantly slower than the non= -ZTS PHP, and=20 > it=E2=80=99s significantly less robust in the sense that a single bug=20 > somewhere can bring down an entire server (or at least a bunch of many=20 > different threads). What are your reasons to choose it over FastCGI? I have no reasons to ever use it. I've thought about dropping the=20 support of ZTS in Xdebug for a while now. I might just do that when 5.5=20 comes along... cheers, Derick --8323329-13603194-1359470095=:6128--