Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65390 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68268 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2013 13:55:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2013 13:55:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.180 mail-ob0-f180.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.180] ([209.85.214.180:37083] helo=mail-ob0-f180.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6B/7C-10721-7A4D7015 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:55:02 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so411290obb.25 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:54:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-mailer :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=0xsg56CfkXB0Wln+Yp29VRBi6x/RrzP0SXjUH7Ou334=; b=Xr7iHNWQ6rBnXvw6UdtcdhGpDHZdlfV3eVPPE0YM6E8MsDS/lcf8/Oc8W5Zci+UCEM 5C1dZafEjFdgr83X2ei9UTfiWGR4UgRa9AzbT4QEIb2sEmIc7rlNBkPPF2lIDNRX8iYq npr5tTf35slMRvTvG0tQ+/3C4q+jorwuBxv3ypZK12VR9wbYHY4xiZBT1pkD0AofLtFm FXOeADk1AvgzE16VnRlnddILLhEenrTopHa9ES8cNA4b8aE4pbt/2SUluYbOua2i93jW IH5OHnvYSD2/C3aJrv+UqUQH0TBaQRLywjE8vdm5276vRY1xsiSqNTSmHDN4Z9vhHgSc VnDg== X-Received: by 10.182.17.70 with SMTP id m6mr762250obd.39.1359467685343; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:54:45 -0800 (PST) References: <5d21b42656d49b4a71d9f808541bd745@mail.gmail.com> <2867ee446726884cd1ac3c2d185499b4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIqL8waXVttbugrqkVxisGQEOzMkQGmqwqWAhkaYrMBO/ApbpeAEXrA Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: <701b5012c7b84bd872e245c2c4eb4521@mail.gmail.com> To: Kalle Sommer Nielsen Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQng8tJJRBvzJf6E3iTgFN4mt9UPuKPfJJGSUvLem8Dx73DeIQKT8s6zNwBzTAbmYaAykmJ7cZWqY8oXl1k/WQ3B1oOM/Lzk6J44BY6MAX19UNFn54Ra1Gmur6YymBfE3IyQB44p Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP distribution From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: kalle.php@gmail.com [mailto:kalle.php@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kalle > Sommer Nielsen > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:45 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP > distribution > > 2013/1/29 Zeev Suraski : > > The RFC explains the pros and cons of doing that, I don't really have > > any additional reasons to add beyond what I already put there. I > > believe the pros outweigh the cons by a good considerable margin, but > > that's what the vote would be about. Perhaps the one thing worth > > adding is that the people who worked on Optimizer+ are all major > > php.net contributors, including Dmitry, Stas, Andi and myself - it's not some > alien artifact. > > I don't doubt any of your abilities, what I do doubt is that how we can consider > an outside project directly into the core. APC would without a doubt be up to > pair if there was more people willingly to dwell into it (yes dwell as many people > see it as an alien artifact because it touches and modifies some "unusual" things > that the average extension developer don't). I wasn't talking about our abilities, but about our 'outsideness'. Yes, it is/was a closed source component, but it's by the same people that have written a huge deal of PHP's scripting engine. I'd would of course prefer that we evaluate the proposal based on the substance and not on other factors, but that said, I fully respect your position and wouldn't hold it against you if you vote 'no'... Zeev