Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65338
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: laruence@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <62d9fb5dafc2a86c98d1a84f83424713@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d0d4398d8ad51ffa330d9d960bcd91a5@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABBJUpctsVUdNPjYANDwpAbGcokxydt1nx4sd8gQnVG4Sqx8gg@mail.gmail.com> <62d9fb5dafc2a86c98d1a84f83424713@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:38:28 +0800
Message-ID: <CABBJUpdcATe3J2j8=NNPgLJT5c3YsrRRMivyb39SC5zVRT4-rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it?
From: laruence@php.net (Laruence)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>> Hey:
>>
>> It's not we choose ZTS, it is there are many users run with them (IIS,
>> Apache+workers, and pthreads extension require it)
>
> For pthreads I can understand it, but why would users be using it on
> IIS/Apache instead of using FastCGI?  FastCGI is both faster and more
> robust.  Is it a matter of lack of knowledge, or is there a real reason to
> use it?
>
>> and all PHP extensions supports it, so if O+ doesn't, it feel a little
>> inconsistent.
>
> My question was outside the context of O+ - it should support it for as long
> as ZTS is available...

Oh, in that case,  I prefer fcgi(eg: nginx fpm) too.  :)

thanks
>
> Zeev



-- 
Laruence  Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/