Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65337
Return-Path: <zeev@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 84337 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2013 09:35:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2013 09:35:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.169 mail-ob0-f169.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.169] ([209.85.214.169:33493] helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 79/42-07604-BE797015 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:35:40 -0500
Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ta14so211604obb.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:35:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-mailer
         :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
         :x-gm-message-state;
        bh=zlj0tvem17vnYFAoITjyGtgYJs9JS4INdCHMK3HRf/g=;
        b=IjMe2DcYgAr5vPXYpM/9BEgQtU9+xDbd7tZbttbWX9wkgdD370kcHnXJP2siDtY+ZY
         0Y5lxjT5XV5FfUSTTaQ39wLrU0CZxhdp3cdEo2oMt0pjVgErUDWtI/oMKIUD07s6w6Cz
         EwvMs7MXApiezFGSYLwYRQI4a307DfG+67a82D7+qdDlYoMwiTwqPNeDolS0frfA63m8
         //SWuxTrMx5NN3xseMhdHFXoH2jTFJjDIWUyJDJvIY611r1uoNu1WzNyXexlnGlUU+mL
         lAliiPb3FbrtFvEDa+znDR4usbqKXEXY98ePd+BncRLMWUH3f6zWa0rpAgCMnM2vllqs
         NS2A==
X-Received: by 10.60.169.205 with SMTP id ag13mr261146oec.40.1359452137067;
 Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:35:37 -0800 (PST)
References: <d0d4398d8ad51ffa330d9d960bcd91a5@mail.gmail.com> <CABBJUpctsVUdNPjYANDwpAbGcokxydt1nx4sd8gQnVG4Sqx8gg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABBJUpctsVUdNPjYANDwpAbGcokxydt1nx4sd8gQnVG4Sqx8gg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJJdUzE2iPwKiwvzciYvchG03LAWgHt6zIql1mtiKA=
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:35:35 +0200
Message-ID: <62d9fb5dafc2a86c98d1a84f83424713@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laruence <laruence@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlnLjZ4azYEQRNGivlcVLyW55AIPCz55hKsejZzGJtEsibF4IM1moHjQjJpCjT7tnb6dbq1Xs/WjSqZk70fc7JR0295O2NMQlkb6qLANR6ilLESWG35iYLHrXGIA/QfG/QKq+iR
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it?
From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski)

> Hey:
>
> It's not we choose ZTS, it is there are many users run with them (IIS,
> Apache+workers, and pthreads extension require it)

For pthreads I can understand it, but why would users be using it on
IIS/Apache instead of using FastCGI?  FastCGI is both faster and more
robust.  Is it a matter of lack of knowledge, or is there a real reason to
use it?

> and all PHP extensions supports it, so if O+ doesn't, it feel a little
> inconsistent.

My question was outside the context of O+ - it should support it for as long
as ZTS is available...

Zeev