Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65319 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54417 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2013 07:55:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2013 07:55:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@rotorised.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@rotorised.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rotorised.com from 117.55.227.19 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@rotorised.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 117.55.227.19 mta19-data1.ironport1.cbr1.mail-filtering.com.au Received: from [117.55.227.19] ([117.55.227.19:47417] helo=mta19-data1.ironport1.cbr1.mail-filtering.com.au) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 93/55-28517-67087015 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:55:35 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFAFt/B1Gva64T/2dsb2JhbABEgziDDrgSFnOCHgEBBAEjVQEFCwsNCwICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiAcFrgOCQJAhgSOOT4ETA5JahE+EPBMiijuDCQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,557,1355058000"; d="scan'208";a="714505074" Received: from unknown (HELO ub005lcs09.cbr.the-server.net.au) ([175.107.174.19]) by smtp-data2.ironport1.cbr1.mail-filtering.com.au with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2013 18:55:31 +1100 Received: from [49.176.98.169] (port=5220 helo=[172.20.10.4]) by ub005lcs09.cbr.the-server.net.au with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U062N-002jgf-HK; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:55:28 +1100 Message-ID: <51078062.6050400@rotorised.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:55:14 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Garfield CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <76a9565b2a095a72063a68f106a6b457@mail.gmail.com> <5ed6711b24349c82b7c17dd450ff7c80@mail.gmail.com> <7165e8331e1070234771f7ae9573cdf8@mail.gmail.com> <5106690E.6040908@zerocue.com> <510679E0.1050603@zerocue.com> <510739F0.80602@rotorised.com> <51077649.8010705@garfieldtech.com> <51077A8E.40806@rotorised.com> <51077CBD.5060906@garfieldtech.com> In-Reply-To: <51077CBD.5060906@garfieldtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting periods From: lists@rotorised.com (Ryan McCue) Larry Garfield wrote: > It's great to hear you say that, given that the messaging coming out of > WP at the time was rather hostile. :-) As I noted, the dynamics have changed significantly. I'd say that core committer team as a whole is now much less conservative than before, although they're still just as dedicated to internal backwards compatibility. As an example, it's looking like PDO is almost a certainty for 3.6. It will mean some backwards compatibility issues though, so a while ago, this wouldn't have even been considered. (Note: I'm not a core committer, mainly due to never having the time to commit to it, but I am heavily involved in WP development. I'm also single-handedly responsible for ~10% of the codebase via SimplePie.) > I don't know much if anything about WP internals, but in my experience > with Drupal 8 LSB is about the only 5.3 feature that hasn't mattered to > us. Namespaces/PSR-0 and closures have been very helpful. LSB not so > much, but then I'm pleased to say we have very little static method use > in the first place. Namespaces don't matter to WordPress really, since it'd only be new code using them anyway. Changing existing class names would be a huge internal backwards compatibility break which I doubt will ever happen. Closures, as I mentioned, don't work well with our action/filter system. Basically, in order to be able to unregister a callback, you need to pass in the exact callback that you registered it with; with closures, this isn't possible unless they're assigned to a variable, which defeats the purpose. > Maybe next year it will be time for a GoPHP5.5 project. :-) Hopefully by > then WP will have become less conservative enough to join the effort. Here's hoping. :) -- Ryan McCue