Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65307
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: patrick.allaert@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1301282153530.6128@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
References: <CAAyV7nEWFMqBhKE-Q=MquMANmWp+p27Dn-X7nA5ocWRDHshEKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1301282153530.6128@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:18:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CACwt+Jd=_x7EoA2zo-1E5sVMLkhJ8XAC-ZsN0P5BW7ZqFSOV3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
Cc: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Purpose of voting
From: patrickallaert@php.net (Patrick ALLAERT)

2013/1/28 Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>:
> Both the idea and implementation needs to be sound. If not, I vote "no"
> (and that also means "no" when it makes APC's life harder).

This is a bit unfair. APC is just one byte code caching mechanism out
there, even if it's the mostly used or most performing one (and even
the one I prefer by far).
If it was part of the core, then it would make more sense voting this way.

-- 
Patrick