Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65298
Return-Path: <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 91058 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2013 20:04:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 20:04:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.182 mail-ob0-f182.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.214.182] ([209.85.214.182:37589] helo=mail-ob0-f182.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id CD/5C-28517-EC9D6015 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:04:30 -0500
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id va7so1317181obc.13
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:04:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=kw3c4dBc97dwm2e+w/moYBuiNb9CjWmzThjuNcZtrUU=;
        b=piUm+7+pktNexNmheZJspr9mjELHVjDnAJg8ZVX7a0Qm0G8p6uVW2aUPWK+E6YMfc9
         POZyjjTFrUVIBe8YBQ1eGFPDE4GKDgyF8NSDa1Lc7/QAHiTryTvl39AItrvfv/pBmieR
         KNByQ29G89+c698iPw5dA1OzxB29k/5bxBWZzGkoWxUhkmnFbVD3bx5TgBrpxWuhcKEu
         QCObFhunl4ZfbmoMzurNH7lC9VpUrmCMjFF18OU82A6oec32QDZu00MgDOY8bsTbsCyO
         M9VuKe/DTHD+BVWYErWhAmajkGHaoVjrcOoCuEZG846EQ2bidgiECOfsLt+gnko8Dvgx
         QMQQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.1.168 with SMTP id 8mr12240541oen.46.1359403468367; Mon,
 28 Jan 2013 12:04:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.96.236 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:04:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8443b1f0eaec6316a3e5791c097d5c49@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAyV7nEWFMqBhKE-Q=MquMANmWp+p27Dn-X7nA5ocWRDHshEKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8443b1f0eaec6316a3e5791c097d5c49@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:04:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFMT4NoJVrRyX0okSX9n+7ub_sifXsjXAJwBTAuDZsihCh6Z-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>, internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Purpose of voting
From: morrison.levi@gmail.com (Levi Morrison)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>> What should we be voting on when voting on an RFC: on the RFC proposed
>> feature, or on the patch itself?
>
> I think it should be exclusively on the concept.  We never vote about code
> changes anywhere - including when we refactor existing parts.  Why would
> we vote about the implementation here?
>
> The concept is the important part, not the implementation.

Implementation can be a HUGE factor in whether I vote yes or no.