Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65284 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69941 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2013 19:06:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 19:06:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.170 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.170 mail-ie0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.170] ([209.85.223.170:48912] helo=mail-ie0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 11/C7-28517-D4CC6015 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:06:53 -0500 Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so1360845ieb.29 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:06:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vY+4r/BgV7f2xIWucA6qDzCwY2GpSjEuHdNjyjz2C8M=; b=JCdbgeiCjPso2t9HjKrAm4fn4imexAxmWopYgadYGkYS4J6a0PP5xgQ7E9uXdmxaJT 9xEiZ9bmAqnIDwxJnr5KJRBCGIx+TaF4S7f8o+leHtd76dbXzKjHbODAcvAXZHwAL9Fy Buvwo6Ye/ZlGkRmuthXGQ86A40nyEZiW0pQIKL+vmfPjniJCCIcc+lEdzpLw+q/KjGY+ gNWixjAK1MBvcCbka7ev+UpFYW1vxwPykmQVzNBAkfP70jqHsRemew1FBbkzyAHDpEal BCPhpLBPGHKHGO2HbvGrom9gTnPK+54Sq/KzUHc4t5Fxb5hGojZpyeh9NMlPImcBsDPw T+PQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.196.130 with SMTP id im2mr5780133igc.17.1359400009842; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:06:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.106.138 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:06:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.106.138 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:06:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F90FD48.7080601@sugarcrm.com> References: <4F8DF4B1.2040307@sugarcrm.com> <4F8F2304.7090402@sugarcrm.com> <4F8F2C50.4080102@sugarcrm.com> <4F90FC23.3000709@anderiasch.de> <4F90FD48.7080601@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:06:49 +0100 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" , Florian Anderiasch Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9341071b1c11904d45dfa6f Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] skipping optional parameters From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --14dae9341071b1c11904d45dfa6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2012.04.20. 8:08, "Stas Malyshev" ezt =C3=ADrta: > > Hi! > > > I can't estimate the amount of breakage, but what about using underscor= e > > (literal _) without quotation marks? > > This one is taken. See: http://us2.php.net/_ > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > Hi, what is the status of the rfc? were there any reasons why you didn't called for votes? Personally I would prefer named parameters also, and I think that we are too close to the 5.5 feature freeze, but somebody asked why did the progress stopped and I don't think that there were any showstopper issues. --14dae9341071b1c11904d45dfa6f--