Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65262
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 29149 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2013 15:49:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 15:49:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.43 mail-la0-f43.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.43] ([209.85.215.43:44964] helo=mail-la0-f43.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 45/9F-28517-BFD96015 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:49:16 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ek20so903713lab.30
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:49:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=EXfo3eUASXP2cT1NwsqVJMr3Zo4obLhoLWX3iHkWhoM=;
        b=NfgFWaT+4HCUD0S2hKtT/wuhjwxHdCrlWJvHVKSripSMgZPylbFbBAsA98YcP+yFZj
         pyV/vOka2DvjNu5bV6qFW9Ge45TaYjFJs0eFxlB3Ji8RJEzudzPZYZhbtmu/PKXVbibM
         3QCVlDIQJP9K+LThVjMJfKY6ZJCkfoQv5E2PaAZbayJ9yL/ypnkzHu4KF0p6EF7hMXEs
         Civyh9RM/lX1vtfR1eiVkj1amO6ygWNXQA+nbj8uy56bsqxLB50RKuaKiRwvLjJzKuLv
         fm9QpEvkuPQtQZi+18Sxjb8RHvhAUaUUeb5hWS9jyueXYLO4wyuv3IWImQaHGHYlBUNQ
         yqKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.83.133 with SMTP id q5mr5806347lby.40.1359388149336;
 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:49:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.2.69 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:49:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d056d255115ffebb71281b5ba17a214c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <op.wq746rv5idpuyk@damnation.nl.lo.geleia.net>
	<op.wrmidlpiidpuyk@damnation.nl.lo.geleia.net>
	<debcd9bb-79f3-4b2c-aa66-9461018959c9@email.android.com>
	<op.wrmkyvlwidpuyk@damnation.nl.lo.geleia.net>
	<1460659e-237d-4c7c-8cfa-523ec857d646@email.android.com>
	<be26f8067c25e21448eb7f3fc21809b0@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU4y_K3FP0KLiLv=a20n1DvPihvknGwYDaX8Vto1DMr3iw@mail.gmail.com>
	<d056d255115ffebb71281b5ba17a214c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:49:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4NGyQLhHpvCJyRQJevaSNp_cgsL2QxEN1Vj04K5ih6Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Alan Knowles <alan@roojs.com>, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>, 
	PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Deprecate and remove calls from incompatible context
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> What does it mean then?  That implementing this RFC waits for 6.0 or that
> it was invalid in the first place?

Both, if the plan is to get that into 5.x.

--
Pierre

@pierrejoye