Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65254 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18094 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2013 15:07:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 15:07:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=leight@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=leight@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: leight@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.171 mail-ia0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.171] ([209.85.210.171:51998] helo=mail-ia0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B0/4D-28517-82496015 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:07:20 -0500 Received: by mail-ia0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z13so4346008iaz.16 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:07:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Nub56ihOk4KmPUR5CDOMm8/mlDtdQhqAddVM5Eswbyc=; b=w9A8UmZLbOSxpKVpXutqOWTwdF6dsPddBBmkahVbnDmAFPX4RmcyzQrntsgKT7QGPV OkXxxqAs/N/91P1fCOQDLR61pMHz3pDg3qMWSwsXGCZj3Tc6fvjSD6z8Bos3jLrYUsze xZPbDo9yS9qCKtbEVodOvkcv3lN3NTmGezjqBAYWwuShugYeOtjWUCT46MFhRDqrfZwi mORfVtPfoynWGp+FRVFZMUGod6+diNbk+hwGLity+es6UPggp1Wl/LW0aG55oI6XCchU TyVfS+AQzLhrhb46v1q4eFFrj7z4ffaeWvO0DTaToQDseQVRYbstr0GSu8wVFDeD9lht DXig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.150.135 with SMTP id ui7mr1440652igb.55.1359385637627; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.70.2 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:07:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1460659e-237d-4c7c-8cfa-523ec857d646@email.android.com> References: <1460659e-237d-4c7c-8cfa-523ec857d646@email.android.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:07:17 +0000 Message-ID: To: Alan Knowles Cc: Gustavo Lopes , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434bf720b255a04d45aa2fc Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Deprecate and remove calls from incompatible context From: leight@gmail.com (Leigh) --f46d0434bf720b255a04d45aa2fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 28 January 2013 14:49, Alan Knowles wrote: > I was trying to vote against, for what it's worth. > > It's a major bc break with no obvious value, and what appears to be 7 days > given to vote when every one is busy discussing a new property syntax. > See other thread by Zeev :) On 20 January 2013 19:17, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > I've opened the vote for the "remove calls from incompatible context" RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/incompat_ctx#vote > Gustavo, it's probably a good idea in future to be a little more verbose about the content of an RFC. The original mail didn't really give much context with what was being proposed, so was easily skimmed over I guess. That said, it *was* announced through the correct channels, and if you see and RFC and don't know what it's about, all you have to do is click it and see. On 28 January 2013 14:17, Alan Knowles wrote: > But this is a core php feature, for anyone who does not use traits.... We > use this quite a bit, it may not be for purists, but it has worked > perfectly for years. This is getting a bit silly, change for change sake.... > > So your code has been generating errors since 2006 and you didn't think to fix it? E_STRICT is an error just like any other. Ok, probably shouldn't start a discussion about this, but it was my first thought. --f46d0434bf720b255a04d45aa2fc--