Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65240 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93486 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2013 13:00:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 13:00:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 209.85.219.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.45 mail-oa0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.219.45] ([209.85.219.45:51126] helo=mail-oa0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/78-28517-56676015 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:00:22 -0500 Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id o6so673028oag.32 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:00:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-mailer :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=qzFJhmj1GpwND5Ygyv8lcj+Ed5xStgH2JgytSbNSnfM=; b=YAwUf9fgE+h++pgfifvV6SNMVXGE+EeFnVCz2ItRfARi40QHdj7hByYYvA5PBgZN61 GgYNd6XpsKm508BSkPPNXNtpNyiRF0PGRH2n8RMU1OWtznsUhmhVuPJwsmiverDKnUbp 40cHJMNGCCjHEVeNjAisn4F1bEcSFqR/j3ng+QAhBwxfUETfqudheOFQSbuYTtQ8a3/E W1rAUiV3Tt+86d3Z2t1+0RzoQkf5LDZ73Q0zOkid9kMfUI/+bS7T0dzkBvR5N8859VVY Y0/ylaISmqHSqx2gEa9t6KF0zXLIgJzg6VnCN1kLXiXHnoil7lutsgMS+Hrxq7OXH2vr 9JZw== X-Received: by 10.182.72.69 with SMTP id b5mr11226008obv.4.1359378018208; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:00:18 -0800 (PST) References: <76a9565b2a095a72063a68f106a6b457@mail.gmail.com> <5ed6711b24349c82b7c17dd450ff7c80@mail.gmail.com> <7165e8331e1070234771f7ae9573cdf8@mail.gmail.com> <5106690E.6040908@zerocue.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQItj407fvbyyHusXdfq7WqB3TBWzwH/50DcAYH7XhQC750pEQD+3ruMAeryfbIBsOMj+JdHLVGw Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:00:17 +0200 Message-ID: <0c562257e5e083f708cc7d24dbb1b4aa@mail.gmail.com> To: Pierre Joye , Clint Priest Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJguPv6TYUwFV35iKCjnvd9CQIHpL464dDzPBgzw0W3RiW1MX0PZ6sfkb/FumXTmilahZZ8PQygr37WSaHRdk3IkbJhoXA16SW0IApcP8lUn3XZuMPgO+m9YK6jl896n/jDWfZ Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Voting periods From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > Zeev, for one, was one of them asking to have a 2/3 majority for any language > related RFC. That's what applies to this RFC, and it is, as of now, accepted. I don't > see how the vote is remotely close to a tie. Are you talking about https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2? There are presently 33 supporteds, 21 opposers. That's less than 2/3 (there would have to be 37 supporters vs. 21 opposers for it to be more than the needed 2/3). On Wednesday evening it was even less than that. Zeev