Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65228 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65723 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2013 09:39:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2013 09:39:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.176 mail-lb0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.176] ([209.85.217.176:56731] helo=mail-lb0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 17/14-28517-05746015 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:39:29 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s4so3548439lbc.21 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:39:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LyhXs4i7qu1htimlUhVTjnrfvarnmtL3tGe7mfHHj3E=; b=VB6KKJixja8z9dC0ZTuAQ7mlskdJNJc4AsAOvcHyxl4Oiwq2N4gBToYT8bLWRvoKdI PBw1hMqotZKvqUzq2IhG30EmCtEY1HWRyBu4rquEXqugVDXa+LAJ/9RePx7a3cSvqH7n j1AHiju0BtqiktGdT+uupP+7efnB++5YxlyN3srY35WmThhz0K78J2oAIXvScMolPZ+m wBCPf/1IfYuQbjaH2H9F5XAbChJj5FIW6txOkxM+tIwhoK+tlzip+YpUXQ0AX4ps0SuP b0WuGZ+qDQc6wT6qAM5Nw03FBJ6Nvo5Tfpi73GdKaDdI15VaJDKl83SjiRLZNxWXD0hU sJhg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.105.103 with SMTP id gl7mr12516845lab.41.1359365965481; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:39:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.2.69 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:39:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <76a9565b2a095a72063a68f106a6b457@mail.gmail.com> References: <76a9565b2a095a72063a68f106a6b457@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:39:25 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Voting periods From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Hi, > > > > There=92s something that I=92m not quite following regarding open votes. > > Why are we saying that =91votes will end no sooner than X=92, instead of > actually saying when they *will* end? > > > > If there=92s no clear end date for a vote, when do we declare than a vote= is > over? Is it in a specific point in time where the vote happens to be in > favor with what the proposer wanted? Itt was more defined as a "minimum voting period". > The specific case in point is > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2 - which while has more > supporters than opposers, consistent fell short of the 2/3 majority it > needs to be approved. The vote should have ended on Wednesday =96 4 days > ago, but for some reason it=92s still open. It=92s time to close it. > > > > My suggestion is for voting periods to be limited to one week, regardless > of the topic. It should be more than enough. Regardless, an =91open end= ed=92 > voting period is unacceptable IMHO. You were one of the person who requested to have at least two weeks, so nobody can miss a vote due to various reasons (on the road, off time, or whatever else). I'd to keep two weeks. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org