Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65176 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82018 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2013 17:18:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jan 2013 17:18:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com does not designate 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.169 mail-ob0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.169] ([209.85.214.169:58022] helo=mail-ob0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/50-14132-06EB2015 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:18:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ta14so710506obb.28 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:x-mailer :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=wXo1RzxBR7p9vCHHlOTvDYr0mfNKR+NRWU+hJ5ll/qw=; b=cgYUclYpnCV3MV57pPX3B9YpouHKsBl4dBoXE6IhWdOaKfAdTyCSqlxPsFTcsUyaHR lQP5X3/MH7cQBXN+VXLpwFmIvgI3UIzmPx1vr3VgICOg1eTGztA2S+CTLKxbPzRh/00V IZnr3BMyfLHvgqBXVhmBcSWvNkH2CaE9fWKUNSNveKVmdJDfK7p4Q3J2a5a0KJWbMU52 fNOsC72JNh6AWWROeE11HcFnZ6A/3dV6Y+G3mdgqJ2sHFCuZbdXtG3lcVtHf51ZGmHEi QxyigcU5jUB1txp2iHUbafWHdF2HViKPbvUIJboUuuvF4vA6I4XDprW2+EkIoNDOB5rj MJ4g== X-Received: by 10.182.182.101 with SMTP id ed5mr5130327obc.23.1359134302175; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:18:22 -0800 (PST) References: <51023AB1.2010607@b1-systems.de> <51024016.4010005@lerdorf.com> <6AA61A4F-ABF0-4FF2-A509-3FE70297B744@php.net> In-Reply-To: <6AA61A4F-ABF0-4FF2-A509-3FE70297B744@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQH5KhtP6VxxLAoJObFXtxoIw+gBzgJTObh3AnFb11YDa6R5KAFZ2VOEAfpcKa4CQqxYc5eVsnDA Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:18:21 +0200 Message-ID: To: Will Fitch , Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: Ralf Lang , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmWiwBtHAOP8B/LgLS5YisM4ZSLwQmDymX6VcdkHCBB6h/2G5GajpaWXEklTJewAa5Nl73VX0CtyxVZjuy22V+2++HZG1gWWXA+li6ushY4nkeyBQENToOcew+K1HVbMRDdDvZ+ Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] HEADS UP: Upcoming Feature Freeze for PHP 5.5.0 From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Fitch [mailto:wfitch@meetme.com] On Behalf Of Will Fitch > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 6:48 PM > To: Zeev Suraski; Rasmus Lerdorf > Cc: Ralf Lang; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] HEADS UP: Upcoming Feature Freeze for PHP 5.5.0 > > > On Jan 25, 2013, at 11:25 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > >> Either by a number of people stepping up to help with the existing > >> APC > > code, or > >> perhaps more realistically making it a priority in PHP 5.6 to > >> streamline > > the > >> engine and the executor for opcode caching and either including a > > heavily > >> simplified version of APC or writing a new one. > >> > >> One thing I can guarantee is that if we add it to core in its current > > condition it > >> will delay 5.5 by 6+ months if not longer. > > > > There's another option. We have the Optimizer+ component which is > > current, a bit faster than APC, worked with PHP 5.4 from the get go > > and already fully supports 5.5 - and now that it's been free for use > > for several years, we'd actually be happy to opensource it and make it > > a part of core. An extra benefit would be that we'd commit to > > maintain it, although of course, community contribution will be very welcome. > > Here too, it's code with a very long history, some of which even > > predates PHP 4.0. But It Works(tm), and we could put some effort into > > cleaning it up and beautifying it. > > I like the idea. If this was implemented in core, and the need for APC opcode > caching disappeared, would APC still be actively maintained for userland > functions (e.g. apc_store, apc_*)? We could either do that, or create some sort of a merge between the two projects and take the apc_*() APIs into a combined module. I think that would give us the best of both worlds. Zeev