Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65142 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87359 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2013 05:56:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2013 05:56:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.163 smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.163] ([67.192.241.163:54912] helo=smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/32-65404-40DC0015 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:56:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3C4AE2701D7; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:56:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 8D38327033C; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:56:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5100CD00.3030608@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:56:16 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Christopher Jones , PHP internals , Florian Anderiasch References: <50FDC4D8.6030105@oracle.com> <51001FE2.7090109@anderiasch.de> <51008FE0.7010908@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][vote] 5.3 EOL From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I asked many native speakers and all understood it as "when 5.5.0 stable > release will be announced". I didn't even think it may mean anything else until I've read this thread. I don't think any significant number of voters understood it this way, it's sound kind of weird - why would we want to keep releasing 5.3 a year after we stopped releasing 5.5? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227