Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65135
Return-Path: <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 54401 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2013 23:06:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2013 23:06:12 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.174 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cryptocompress@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.174 mail-ea0-f174.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.174] ([209.85.215.174:59149] helo=mail-ea0-f174.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 69/77-30997-1EC60015 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:06:11 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 1so3746803eaa.33
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:06:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=nsfsw6GHiKj+D5SUWnkEgK7uUxRYa2gvcjTOAA2IWh0=;
        b=k5mzRYlv8+PVonoqmToMsFYsr3603jWeuo1+dD8woQmIPuyJ2Xb9kgjbn+q7KH1eL7
         b+9T9T1bc4lDokHYUbcepITzvNUmLu7rmBkqW+MK2CoxVOgthvBd4cTMjrdZ24sYQh8y
         OPwSGiSgVU3gsEVuverBvpKCvxHUBZBjeL6EmHIEbyJQKziFH8W7jSQlGnPilihUVxXe
         ohvJKM4UAAMsP2UBnsUt43wQ4OIXpAYO8wQ/XabVJ75jGSp+GAWM7iUieg3dt8OLdEye
         Ux5Cekwlik3BRwlZENFAgpzlfBuqHtoHGeMvsSlt3jfgiMjaV28DBiYZSqHaSzYS29PN
         aRZg==
X-Received: by 10.14.193.131 with SMTP id k3mr8728372een.45.1358982367366;
        Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.111] (mnch-5d85de30.pool.mediaWays.net. [93.133.222.48])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm32698818eea.3.2013.01.23.15.06.05
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51006C84.2090307@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:04:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <510038C9.5000900@mrclay.org> <B103E205-5F44-4524-9BCD-7BF241F7E552@zerocue.com> <CAFMT4Nq+27=7BuqrJggjjf8mT_NBAXr7v-qzkWazFgdQLYTRew@mail.gmail.com> <510065B8.7040608@zerocue.com> <510066F2.3040202@lerdorf.com> <5100675A.9040809@zerocue.com>
In-Reply-To: <5100675A.9040809@zerocue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] C# properties vs. accessors RFC
From: cryptocompress@googlemail.com (Crypto Compress)

Hello!

1) not able to vote
2) looked at patch
3) do not understand the patch

so i have a question regarding guards... e.g.:

guard->in_unset = 1; /* Prevent recursion */
zend_call_method_with_1_params(&object, zobj->ce, &zobj->ce->__unset, 
ZEND_UNSET_FUNC_NAME, NULL, member);
guard->in_unset = 0; /* Prevent recursion */

this code would only prevent nested/parallel access to same accessor but 
not circular?
e.g.: getter -> setter -> null-checker -> null-setter -> getter
sorry it this is a dumb question :)

cryptocompress