Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65133 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50137 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2013 22:40:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2013 22:40:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.128.175 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.175 mail-ve0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.175] ([209.85.128.175:43428] helo=mail-ve0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 28/C6-30997-8F660015 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:40:57 -0500 Received: by mail-ve0-f175.google.com with SMTP id db12so1196603veb.34 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=M1G38ziO3696zBCId5GxjEehYRb45NOEcZkYifr5mjA=; b=fBPe2pxSC8ncA9UZBUIZv+TVgf1lKtTBd1M4LEQCfsBT8AGjKyYsjDrnqBsG+irwoR EKij9V3aJ44vLdtZaph2DaaZj9UPS4O8rF9gh3IOHUgIGUxaX7NYZmAkd7OLczSOuY5J zQ3iU7KSYQpPoGsedmqCxA1TN4ISA76HdO8Qfts3JELrDnbbJA3dXUd+mkB+wSZcJx4C 4FK2V+mHT83DQPrqIjgRjok1c8Dm7yYVeWHCQmPfRDoRRHJbEVMaEcLAZEzS3slSemvS HAuvkfl0nCpWr2YhuoCApjKBCcGzUGLhnKmA83StfTu2EMWXfR9V5DfwXCoMWx7R4YOp FxmA== X-Received: by 10.220.116.5 with SMTP id k5mr3296264vcq.55.1358980853326; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:40:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.200.148] (c-50-131-44-225.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [50.131.44.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q13sm12196869vdh.22.2013.01.23.14.40.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:40:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <510066F2.3040202@lerdorf.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:40:50 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Clint Priest CC: Levi Morrison , PHP Developers Mailing List References: <510038C9.5000900@mrclay.org> <510065B8.7040608@zerocue.com> In-Reply-To: <510065B8.7040608@zerocue.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn2i9hNlp5vJLyR8FaPNwgyhm/+fta2A5xFOEd4ccXGI/Edm9S0eSF718m7C198rOYo7r4P Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] C# properties vs. accessors RFC From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 01/23/2013 02:35 PM, Clint Priest wrote: > > On 1/23/2013 3:17 PM, Levi Morrison wrote: >> Clint: I'm sorry that you spent all that time without hearing feedback >> from a lot of the "No" voters. Had they been participating all along >> perhaps it could have been avoided. We'll never know. > > I appreciate that, I'm hearing through the grapevine that some of the > "no" voters haven't even looked at the patch. Just to be fair, I suspect quite a few "yes" voters haven't looked at, nor understood the patch. -Rasmus