Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65131
Return-Path: <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 46700 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2013 22:27:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2013 22:27:06 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.173 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cryptocompress@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.173 mail-ea0-f173.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.173] ([209.85.215.173:49465] helo=mail-ea0-f173.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 23/26-30997-9B360015 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:27:05 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i1so3308544eaa.32
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:27:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type;
        bh=Wej9PJ2aLhgdZPq3gR+kpSC9DtwSsDfx2Bl7oW0YOO0=;
        b=mPc02ldoCthmG3aNM3si5MSTt/6748+t5jBS+7V6vrjFFB+Mnu9se5Wq0C8emjC25V
         gY+RyaD3+Hg6kgj6ZTHbM1Dw1x+Tr06mvgay44j8orsx5H3n4HFvddWf3QZ7BPZiSa7C
         m5y/SPcHDhkPOmtcrBD6944WhqI+/i5idc4iDO6/8QNjb6WH/GywJ2UoxKlDO3nIYykE
         KYa/BxEHfwTZUkMSCdIBeCghEXL/KWoS0V/UttbgGsYmFnMWDkGc9nl981g3EYIDmCNd
         /QLAJntLSmc7lZfO2zn810WYJ23XxR/PWTSlQUlZGkRCBeNTQTbSSxRDBvVpoQEQZ3gs
         wh3w==
X-Received: by 10.14.215.194 with SMTP id e42mr8500961eep.32.1358980022119;
        Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:27:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.111] (mnch-5d85de30.pool.mediaWays.net. [93.133.222.48])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d3sm32626949eeo.13.2013.01.23.14.27.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:27:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5100635B.7060707@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:25:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <510038C9.5000900@mrclay.org> <B103E205-5F44-4524-9BCD-7BF241F7E552@zerocue.com> <51005108.2010906@googlemail.com> <51005275.1050304@zerocue.com>
In-Reply-To: <51005275.1050304@zerocue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------040505070109080108090808"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] C# properties vs. accessors RFC
From: cryptocompress@googlemail.com (Crypto Compress)

--------------040505070109080108090808
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Well actually you're right.  .3 was written by Dennis long ago and I 
> wrote accessors to be exactly as that document described except where 
> there was ambiguity.

@Steve Clay: this would be a perfect point to start with

--------------040505070109080108090808--