Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65117 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6260 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2013 17:37:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2013 17:37:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ml@anderiasch.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ml@anderiasch.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain anderiasch.de from 81.169.138.148 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ml@anderiasch.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.138.148 ares.art-core.org Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [81.169.138.148] ([81.169.138.148:59132] helo=mail.anderiasch.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 96/F0-30997-6EF10015 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:37:43 -0500 Message-ID: <51001FE2.7090109@anderiasch.de> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 18:37:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Jones CC: Pierre Joye , PHP internals References: <50FDC4D8.6030105@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <50FDC4D8.6030105@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][vote] 5.3 EOL From: ml@anderiasch.de (Florian Anderiasch) On 01/21/2013 11:44 PM, Christopher Jones wrote: > Pierre, > > Can you review this RFC and the votes? The wording "5.5 final > release" needs assessing. You probably meant "first 5.5 production > release". If anyone interpreted it as it is actually written > i.e. "terminal 5.5 release", then the vote needs to be re-run. How do you plan to find out who would've taken it that way? Ask all who voted? Maybe it sounds more ambiguous for a native speaker, but I actually had to reread this mail to get your point. I've never heard anyone use "final" as "terminal", the "final" in the software development domain has always been the name for the version after the RCs, at least for me. Greetings, Florian