Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65102 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30329 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2013 00:59:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2013 00:59:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.213.50 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.50 mail-yh0-f50.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.50] ([209.85.213.50:37014] helo=mail-yh0-f50.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 19/D2-12923-8D53FF05 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:59:05 -0500 Received: by mail-yh0-f50.google.com with SMTP id z12so1161443yhz.9 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:59:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=pLejYP4YJr0tSb+h3HWPcyoQmvT9rRw5HyzJWy0Zy4Q=; b=pjyRRi48/n7/BCkokNjetQ5VbPfYg03CXl92RAIqgUEjzb0/UTpnb4f7UocYBd5fYN RhBTkKj5GNnsCLaEvxZB0TIzLewYSYJekHDLCk/ClEBoJ0a14f3sC0JGHZgvpLh/ZiGB WE8AYJfSfsA8tsMRWKIy+rIq3IAjwlKKmgWjVNdbvfBo8K58qcfCLq7TePLIplq5wpN6 rbDnEZhjLL87E/oGIHUlD0UnHw+jN8KWFYxkNRe7r12Nutfvfd84VYKRzp1khnEdqenf Hnc0YGnhqeYkljKewLtdx1giWDb01u12YuYwOHh8mp9xYpKdt1RT6e+OeJo6FSV1R0R/ tQLg== X-Received: by 10.236.176.198 with SMTP id b46mr26974446yhm.43.1358902742274; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:59:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.200.148] (c-50-131-44-225.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [50.131.44.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j13sm6252892ani.19.2013.01.22.16.59.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:59:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50FF35D3.1050606@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:58:59 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Ferrara CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <50F840F4.7080704@zerocue.com> <50FE7579.1010409@zerocue.com> <50FECA4E.6080408@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVHE04WrbvoEnOZ/khdy21UZUDI5S/AU4SHIV/eOI9rE3zrTym2sxfcOaICLCt0NgXTQ7J Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Property Accessors for 5.5 From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 01/22/2013 04:41 PM, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > Rasmus, > > If you look at the split in voting you will notice it is > pretty much split along the lines of the people who have to maintain > this code vs. the people who would like a shiny new feature. > > > I pulled some numbers, and this isn't really the case. > > Based off of commits from the past year (since 2012-01-01), here are the Now do 5 or even 10+ years and commits to Zend and APC. We are talking about a core language feature here, so commits to the code most affected is what you should be looking at and when I talk about maintenance I talk about code we are fixing 10 years from now. Commits in the past year doesn't really reflect that very well. -Rasmus