Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65101 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28553 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2013 00:41:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2013 00:41:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ircmaxell@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ircmaxell@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ircmaxell@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.42 mail-vb0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.42] ([209.85.212.42:55322] helo=mail-vb0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8D/72-12923-EB13FF05 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:41:34 -0500 Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ff1so4879700vbb.29 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:41:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wr8TBZyvfmuOorOMYUY6Yeht9wMwh3bPRu7KXzfo9po=; b=Soopwxd6bVpBlkoZMWleH9Le5ED6tKSZhBJg/435Thr8/VdSeiBxNV0KX0cTJb6KtZ EhSBsG9rl4QR3zy5ltRtxsN73natBWFBL+SjdOMSSeb4X82K9SDqzWNSQJDeb0osa2nw R1JfTZeFS3tAX3rxPKYgr2W6w5dDyDFtApyDwIFgWHB+j/0/GNnEP3zh4Fa7Dv60nsGE PCkNqmXVZMz3BhG18E9TTh33dzqjKJUYQURDxeAf7/FxLYd9DHsnCc+mlgzYk3a6HsXM TXe+AnQXSbDfqx6EYPdlkAos0z1bjNrAga0Mroy44Cx2Ywha1r48KVjiSq9ms1CnmOLp WZng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.1.142 with SMTP id nq14mr12787634vcb.3.1358901692031; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.173.4 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:41:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50FECA4E.6080408@lerdorf.com> References: <50F840F4.7080704@zerocue.com> <50FE7579.1010409@zerocue.com> <50FECA4E.6080408@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:41:31 -0500 Message-ID: To: Rasmus Lerdorf Cc: Clint Priest , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54eee52a3622504d3e9f4e2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Property Accessors for 5.5 From: ircmaxell@gmail.com (Anthony Ferrara) --bcaec54eee52a3622504d3e9f4e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Rasmus, If you look at the split in voting you will notice it is > pretty much split along the lines of the people who have to maintain > this code vs. the people who would like a shiny new feature. > I pulled some numbers, and this isn't really the case. Based off of commits from the past year (since 2012-01-01), here are the raw numbers: No: 1238 Yes: 895 But if you remove the top 2 committing voters (in general, not tied to a list), the numbers even out quite significantly: No: 514 Yes: 456 So I think that point falls somewhat flat... I'm not saying this to raise issues or anything. I just want to point out that the active maintainers are working on both sides of the fence. It's not a "maintainers" vs "the others" vote split... Anthony --bcaec54eee52a3622504d3e9f4e2--