Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65073 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54519 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2013 11:18:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2013 11:18:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cpriest@zerocue.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cpriest@zerocue.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zerocue.com designates 67.200.53.250 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cpriest@zerocue.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.200.53.250 mail.zerocue.com Received: from [67.200.53.250] ([67.200.53.250:37149] helo=mail.zerocue.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 70/93-28294-2857EF05 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:18:27 -0500 Received: from [172.17.0.122] (unknown [70.112.216.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.zerocue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55B97120363 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <50FE7579.1010409@zerocue.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 05:18:17 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <50F840F4.7080704@zerocue.com> In-Reply-To: <50F840F4.7080704@zerocue.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Property Accessors for 5.5 From: cpriest@zerocue.com (Clint Priest) On 1/17/2013 12:20 PM, Clint Priest wrote: > I'm happy to say that Property Accessors is ready for a vote for > inclusion in 5.5 release. > > Nikita and I (as well as Stas a bit) have all been working hard to > make this happen for 5.5, voting and the specifications are here: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2#voting > For those that have voted against this proposal, are there any clarifications that can be made or questions answered? There seems to be a lot of userland support for this proposal from people who don't have voting rights. -- -Clint