Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:65066
Return-Path: <lars.schultz@toolpark.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 35963 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2013 08:15:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2013 08:15:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars.schultz@toolpark.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars.schultz@toolpark.com; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain toolpark.com from 195.49.42.12 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars.schultz@toolpark.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.49.42.12 mail1.screenlight.ch  
Received: from [195.49.42.12] ([195.49.42.12:53308] helo=mail1.screenlight.ch)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 23/A0-28294-0AA4EF05 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 03:15:29 -0500
Received: from [192.168.1.112] ([192.168.1.112])
	(authenticated user lars.schultz@toolpark.com)
	by mail1.screenlight.ch (Kerio Connect 7.0.2 patch 1)
	(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits))
	for internals@lists.php.net;
	Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:15:24 +0100
Message-ID: <50FE4A9C.5080901@toolpark.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:15:24 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAF+90c_Aa0TW9WfY8q5=RnSnAwC+8u6J+Ywp-i0+d21TTn8eJw@mail.gmail.com> <op.wq9ysboiidpuyk@damnation.nl.lo.geleia.net> <CAF+90c9fM4VQyHm6kQp9LX+ZqP80mofMde-D9EgDe=+YNw9SeQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c9fM4VQyHm6kQp9LX+ZqP80mofMde-D9EgDe=+YNw9SeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Alternative typehinting syntax for accessors
From: lars.schultz@toolpark.com (Lars Schultz)

Am 22.01.2013 09:07, schrieb Nikita Popov:
> It's not just about the lines of code. It's about having a more readable
> and more intuitive syntax. Am I the only one who thinks that "public $date
> { get; set(DateTime $date); }" looks pretty ugly/unclear compared to
> "public DateTime $date;"?

FWIW: I agree;) If accessors get through, I'd rather have this alternate 
syntax. The other looks like a typo. I don't get to vote though...